[Ietf-not43] call for consensus

Eric A. Hall ehall at ehsco.com
Wed Sep 10 12:41:22 EDT 2003


on 9/10/2003 12:05 PM Andrew Newton wrote:

> Adds and modifies are outside the scope of the work.

I agree that it is out-of-scope as-written. Part of this is also because
we explicitly chose not to look at 2LD and ISP requirements, where
modifies (at least) would be a requirement.

> To be more to the point, if LDAP's add/modify verbs were part of the
> equation, some people on this list have already stated they would not
> use it because of that.

This is akin to saying that they won't use HTTP because it has POST.

-- 
Eric A. Hall                                        http://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols          http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/



More information about the Ietf-not43 mailing list