[Ietf-not43] call for consensus
Eric A. Hall
ehall at ehsco.com
Wed Sep 10 12:41:22 EDT 2003
on 9/10/2003 12:05 PM Andrew Newton wrote:
> Adds and modifies are outside the scope of the work.
I agree that it is out-of-scope as-written. Part of this is also because
we explicitly chose not to look at 2LD and ISP requirements, where
modifies (at least) would be a requirement.
> To be more to the point, if LDAP's add/modify verbs were part of the
> equation, some people on this list have already stated they would not
> use it because of that.
This is akin to saying that they won't use HTTP because it has POST.
--
Eric A. Hall http://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
More information about the Ietf-not43
mailing list