[Ietf-not43] draft CRISP charter

[Andrew Newton]

Sorry... this = proposed new charter  -- as in: "This makes sense."

thanks.

-andy

April Marine wrote:
> mm, when you say "this" do you mean the charter?  because at first I
> thought you meant that doc and that doc is Ginny's draft.
> 
> If you mean the charter, we need to decide after the briefing on the
> draft that Ginny is giving in Minn. as to whether to adopt it as a WG
> item.  Obviously, the draft charter assumes we are going in that
> direction, but I didn't want to be *too* presumptuous.  The draft
> charter/milestones are there as a starting point for discussion--I expect
> they will be tweaked.
> 
> If I misunderstood your question, pls let me know.
> 
> thanks!
> A.
> 
> On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Andrew Newton wrote:
> 
> 
>>This doesn't seem to take into account Ginny's draft on the requirements
>>for number resource registries:
>>
>>
>>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-crisp-internet-resource-number-req-00.txt
>>
>>Is that a given?
>>
>>-andy
>>
>>April Marine wrote:
>>
>>>One of our agenda items is to update our charter and milestones.  We have
>>>kicked around the following and want to run it by the group so you have
>>>time to review before the meeting (and so we can get input from those of
>>>you who won't be attending the meeting).  This is a DRAFT, up for
>>>comments.  I'm sure the milestone dates will change at the mtg.
>>>
>>>thx!
>>>April
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-not43 mailing list
> Ietf-not43 at lists.verisignlabs.com
> https://lists.verisignlabs.com/mailman/listinfo/ietf-not43