[Ietf-not43] IRIS Open Issues

[Ryan Lehning]

George, forgive the newbie question, can you defined "mandatory change
logging?"  

Thanks,
Ryan

-----Original Message-----
From: George Michaelson [mailto:ggm at apnic.net]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 12:55 PM
To: Andrew Newton
Cc: David Blacka; ietf-not43 at lists.verisignlabs.com
Subject: Re: [Ietf-not43] IRIS Open Issues


On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 12:08:21 -0500 Andrew Newton <andy at hxr.us> wrote:

> David Blacka wrote:
> > 
> > Nothing else in CRISP has pointed toward using it to see historical data

> > about a registration object.  I would be somewhat reluctant to start
with 
> > this.
> 
> Agreed.  I'm just throwing it out as a possible thing that could be done 
> due to this change.  I'm not convinced of its usefulness.

In number registry space, it might help with people tracking potential
hijacked
nets. We're considering some issues around mandatory change logging on top
level
objects. Equally, this can be done offline, its more about information
management than lookup.

I think I have some problems conceptualizing what 'sort' means in some of
these
contexts. If you mean 'by time' then the sort isn't on the status, its on
the
date of the status. If there are other more complex sort orders, why isn't
that
being done in the client?

-George
_______________________________________________
Ietf-not43 mailing list
Ietf-not43 at lists.verisignlabs.com
https://lists.verisignlabs.com/mailman/listinfo/ietf-not43