[Ietf-not43] Comments on CRISP Requirements draft-06 and CRIS P Internet Resour ce Number Requirements draft-00

[Ryan Lehning]

Andy,

Thanks for pointing me to this.  Yes, it looks like dreg contains an element
for last verified date.  However, there doesn't appear to be any indication
of how the data was verified.  I'm not sure that users can reasonably rely
on the accuracy of data without some indication of how that data was
verified.  

thanks,
Ryan

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Newton [mailto:anewton at ecotroph.net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 10:08 AM
To: Ryan Lehning
Cc: 'Rick Wesson'; 'ietf-not43 at lists.verisignlabs.com'
Subject: Re: [Ietf-not43] Comments on CRISP Requirements draft-06 and
CRIS P Internet Resour ce Number Requirements draft-00


Ryan Lehning wrote:
> Rick,
> 
> If a "Last Verified Date" would be valuable, why isn't it included in the
> Requirements document?  Do others have comments on whether there are
better
> ways of implementing the SECSAC recommendations than my proposal?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ryan

Yes.  Look at dreg.  I believe this covers the SECSAC recommendation (as 
described by Rick).

-andy