[Ietf-not43] WG Last call: draft-ietf-crisp-requirements-04.txt

[Cathy Murphy]

On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, George Michaelson wrote:

> For extensibility reasons I feel it would be better if the document
> was re-written into a base/general part, and a domain specific part.

I concur. I think splitting the requirements document into some very
generic requirements that apply to other types of registry operations and
requirements for domain registries will facilitate extensibility.

> It would permit future liaison and involvement from other interests.
>
> I realize this is a shame this late in the document cycle, but I think
> a couple of weeks work could deliver a better longterm structure.

Agreed. Expect specific comments on the document to follow shortly.

-Cathy

>
> cheers
> 	-George
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-not43 mailing list
> Ietf-not43@lists.verisignlabs.com
> http://lists.verisignlabs.com/mailman/listinfo/ietf-not43
>