[Ietf-not43] extensibility

[Eric A. Hall]

You mean that implementing a fully-scoped read-write system had the same
basic results in both cases.

I'm sticking to the story that the minimum requirements are lower for FIRS.

on 7/28/2003 12:39 PM Andrew Newton wrote:

> Peter Gietz wrote:
> 
>>Alone the fact that Eric could perl a FIRS client in one week prooves ho 
>>cheap it can be to deploy FIRS. I know it is a long way from proof of 
>>concept to production service, but what makes you think this path is 
>>shorter with XML?
>>
> 
> 
> Speaking as somebody who has put together both types of systems (Pimmit 
> - IRIS -00 and draft-newton-ldap-whois-03.txt*), I can tell you that 
> LDAP offered no speed of implementation or ease of deployment advantages.
> 
> * draft-newton-ldap-whois-03 is not as far reaching as FIRS.
> 
> -andy
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-not43 mailing list
> Ietf-not43 at lists.verisignlabs.com
> https://lists.verisignlabs.com/mailman/listinfo/ietf-not43

-- 
Eric A. Hall                                        http://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols          http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/