[Ietf-not43] CRISP @ RIP43

[Hollenbeck, Scott]

> The third one was not about the charters of the two WG but about the
> actual protocols EPP and IRIS. It was a concern that the two WG are
> making new protocols from scratch instead on relying on an existing
> infrastructure, like Web services (XML-RPC or SOAP). (The LDAP
> proposal in crisp is of course immune from this criticism.)

I can't speak for IRIS, but back when I first started working on EPP both
SOAP and XML-RPC were VERY immature (there was nothing being done with them
in the IETF), and all they did was add another layer of protocol overhead
that wasn't really necessary.  Plus, EPP _can_ be moved around using SOAP or
XML-RPC instead of being streamed over TCP.

-Scott-