[Ietf-not43] -02 c's and q's...

[Ted Hardie]

> 
> > I personal like the "lightweight" language above, but I am concerned
> > about the opt-out mechanism.  If the mechanism is simple enough to
> > opt out without requiring a server-to-server interchange, I think
> > life will be better; I also don't think we can use crisp as the
> > protocol to conduct that interchange, so I am leary of the requirement.
> 
> Which opt-out are you referring to - server or registrant?

Server opt-out.  I'm worried about drifting into server-to-server
protocols.  
			regards,
				Ted Hardie