[Ietf-not43] Next steps

[Ted Hardie]

It's clear from the current discussion on the list that next steps
will need to include re-issuing the requirements draft and going
through a new working group last call.  One consequence of that will
be re-stating our milestones to reflect reality.  I'll incorporate a
discussion of that in the "Milestone and Charter Review" section
below.

Given that we really need to have a discussion of how to go through
the evaluation process, I'm proposing to shift the agenda to:

CRISP Working Group, IETF 55


Agenda Bash, 5 mins 
Evaluation Process, 60 mins
IRIS Diffs, 20 mins
LW Diffs, 20 mins
Milestone & Charter Review, 10 mins
Discussion of Requirements doc changes, 30 minutes.

This ordering is to ensure that we get meeting time on the process
issues when we have high bandwidth time.  All discussion is, of
course, subject to the decision of the working group as expressed on
the list.

Any further immediate bashing should be sent to me as soon as
possible, so I can get the WG agenda onto the IETF web site
in time.
			Ted Hardie








> 
> Well, I'm not stuck on it... and you raise a valid point.  So either way =
> is=20
> fine by me.
> 
> On Tuesday 05 November 2002 07:42 pm, Ted Hardie wrote:
> > I'm actually hoping to focus that discussion on the process itself (do
> > we want to write seperate eval drafts, a combo eval draft, maintain an
> > "issues list" matrix, etc.), rather than focusing on the proposals.
> > I initially put it first in order to help reinforce the idea that
> > this was about the process.  I can do that in any order, of course,
> > and there are elements of draft structure (the splitting of the
> > proposals into multiple documents, e.g) that do relate here.
> >
> > Thoughts from other working group members here?
> > =09=09=09=09=09regards,
> > =09=09=09=09=09=09Ted Hardie
> >
> > > Ted Hardie wrote:
> > > > 1) Agenda Bash, 5 mins (Chair)
> > > > 2) Milestone & Charter Review, 10 mins (Chair)
> > > > 3) Discussion of evaluation process, 60 mins (Chair)
> > >
> > > I'd prefer these two before #3.  A little knowledge of the difference=
> s
> > > between versions may also give insight to the evaluation process.
> > >
> > > > 4) IRIS Diffs, 20 mins (Doc Author)
> > > > 5) LW Diffs, 20 mins (Doc Author?)
> > >
> > > -andy
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ietf-not43 mailing list
> > Ietf-not43@lists.verisignlabs.com
> > http://lists.verisignlabs.com/mailman/listinfo/ietf-not43
>