[Ietf-not43] 3.2.4 Domain Information Lookup

Rick Wesson wessorh@ar.com
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 10:09:21 -0800 (PST)


Paul,

my request is ment to cover extentions such as those provided by enom.

-rick

On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Paul Stahura wrote:

> Also, sometimes registrars have information regarding a domain for which
> they are not the registrar-of-record.  For example, on transfers, enom
> may express information in the port-43 whois output regarding who has
> initiated the transfer request for a name before the name has transferred to
> enom.
> Hopefully we would not be procluded from expressing arbitrary information
> for names we are not the registrar-of-record, right?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Newton [mailto:anewton@verisignlabs.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 7:22 AM
> To: Rick Wesson
> Cc: ietf-not43@lists.verisignlabs.com
> Subject: Re: [Ietf-not43] 3.2.4 Domain Information Lookup
>
>
> Rick Wesson wrote:
> >
> > please add the following to the end of section 3.2.4
> >
> > The domain information set MUST be able to express and represent arbitrary
> > information and extentions on a individual registry/registrar basis such
> > as license agreements, authorized use policies or extended status
> > notifications and/or marketing/for sale notices.
>
> I agree.  This is a commonly needed feature.
>
> -andy
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-not43 mailing list
> Ietf-not43@lists.verisignlabs.com
> http://lists.verisignlabs.com/mailman/listinfo/ietf-not43
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-not43 mailing list
> Ietf-not43@lists.verisignlabs.com
> http://lists.verisignlabs.com/mailman/listinfo/ietf-not43
>