[Ietf-not43] -02 requirements draft

[Rick Wesson]

On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Andrew Newton wrote:

> On Tuesday 05 November 2002 09:08 pm, Rick Wesson wrote:
> >
> > I've objected several times, in person and on the list.
>
> In person?

scott hollenbeck's notes from the registrars constituency meeting in
shanghai china where he presented on crisp and requested comments.

> > 90% of the participitants answering negatively 90% of the time is not an
> > acceptable solution for me. now if somone can show me how this isn't the
> > case for "3.2.3 Domain Registrant Search" I'll shut up.

neither of the notes below address my concern. if we are going retain
3.2.3 we MUST address how the queries are distributed for such a search or
any requirements on the members of the mesh to provide index hints.

not addressing this stuff is a non-starter with the audience you are
designing these protocols for.

-rick


> http://lists.verisignlabs.com/pipermail/ietf-not43/2002-October/000287.html
> and
> http://lists.verisignlabs.com/pipermail/ietf-not43/2002-October/000288.html
>
> -andy
>