[Ietf-not43] Next steps

[Ted Hardie]

I'm glad that you'll be able to attend, and I look forward to meeting
you in person.  Given that you plan to update the drafts, a
presentation on any substantive changes in the proposals is fine, but
it need not be in the format of a draft or with the specificity of a
draft.

In a large part, these slots are ways to get high-bandwidth time on a
proposal.  If there are specific points which you feel it is critical
to understand to evaluate the drafts, this is a time to make them (the
presentation part will be shared with the mailing list).  This
is also an opportunity for those present to share a discussion in
real time.

All decisions remain, however, with the working group as expressed in
mailing list discussion.
				regards,
					Ted Hardie


> I plan on attending (4 hour drive from here), and will be glad to present
> on the subject.
> 
> Note that the LW drafts will be undergoing a significant overhaul over the
> next few weeks. I had planned on getting the updates submitted before the
> cutoff date but that is impossible at this point.
> 
> I've never attended or presented at an IETF before. What's the policy
> here? My understanding is that these slots are not substitutes for the
> drafts, but what are they if not that?
> 
> -- 
> Eric A. Hall                                        http://www.ehsco.com/
> Internet Core Protocols          http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-not43 mailing list
> Ietf-not43@lists.verisignlabs.com
> http://lists.verisignlabs.com/mailman/listinfo/ietf-not43
>