[Ietf-not43] -02 requirements draft

[Ted Hardie]

Rick,
	I understand your concern.  We need to be careful, though,
that we deal with concerns about the requirements in the requirements,
rather than by demonstrating that one or another candidate solution
doesn't have a particular problem.  To avoid this, I'd rather not go
with a "show how this works" resolution to your concern.
	Would you be willing to work with Andy on language for 3.2.3,
that includes something related to the question of equity that you
raise?  That allows the working group to decide if there is general
agreement on the amended requirement, whether it should stay as is,
or be wholly removed.  
			regards,
				Ted Hardie
	




> 
> 
> 
> I still have a major problem with 3.2.3 Domain Registrant Search. I can't
> see how searching is going to be distributed in a fair and equitable way
> and ould like the requirement removed until we have some discussion that
> shows that there is a technicaly feasable way of doing this.
> 
> If noone can stand up and show how everyone in the mesh isn't effected by
> every registrant search then we either need to drop the requirement or
> have a way to recover costs of preforming these queries.
> 
> -rick
> 
> 
> On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Ted Hardie wrote:
> 
> > Hello Folks,
> > 	Andy has sent in a -02 version of the requirements draft to
> > address the wordsmithing issues brought up during last call.  I
> > believe that none of those changes were substantive, so I plan to send
> > it up to the IESG as a candidate for Informational RFC.  If you
> > believe that the changes require further discussion on the list,
> > please let me (and the list) know as soon as possible.
> > 			regards,
> > 				Ted Hardie
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ietf-not43 mailing list
> > Ietf-not43@lists.verisignlabs.com
> > http://lists.verisignlabs.com/mailman/listinfo/ietf-not43
> >
>