[Ietf-not43] XML-RPC for an information service?

[Rick Wesson]

andy,

actually its not at all like the epp work in PROVREG, epp is a protocol
for registries to talk to registrars over, epp is not no has it ever been
used to talk to registrants. although they are all simular they each have
different requirements.

This thread does beg the question... has anyone identified reasons not to
pull from the structures defined in epp?

-rick



On 22 Jul 2002, Andrew Newton wrote:

> At first glance, this appears to be more like the work being done in the
> PROVREG WG than in this one.  Plus I think we are aiming to solve a
> couple more problems?
>
> I wonder why they didn't decide to use EPP?
>
> -andy
>
> On Mon, 2002-07-22 at 11:04, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> > Since the list is very quiet and since I wasn't able to attend the
> > Yokohama meeting, a bit of opinion.
> >
> > I did not see a mention of this information service:
> >
> > http://www.adamsnames.tc/api/xmlrpc.html
> >
> > in the mailing list archives.
> >
> > A part of it, the domquery and may be conquery procedures, are
> > directly related to the work of this WG. Any opinion, any user? I'm
> > specially interested by the fact that it relies on a standard
> > protocol, for which there are many libraries already available. With
> > this API, I can write a "whois" client in a few minutes.
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ietf-not43 mailing list
> > Ietf-not43@lists.verisignlabs.com
> > http://lists.verisignlabs.com/mailman/listinfo/ietf-not43
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-not43 mailing list
> Ietf-not43@lists.verisignlabs.com
> http://lists.verisignlabs.com/mailman/listinfo/ietf-not43
>